Berger, S. K. (2008). The Developing Person: Through the Life Span. New York, NY: Worth Publisher.
Friday, December 31, 2010
Parenting Styles
Dec 31 Oedpius Complex
Punishment dec 31
Parent Punishments
I liked the way chapter 10 really broke down how parenting can completely help or hurt a child. I think in my personal experience my parents had good mixes of both authoritarian and permissive parenting. I remember learning a lot when I was younger through trials and experience I have had and I can relate to almost all factors in chapter ten. I can think of certain examples of how culture variations, discipline and punishment have somehow helped me to develop as a person. I can remember how punishment in my family was never one dimensional. The4re were different types and levels all depending on the crime committed. My parents were very different and they way they worked together gave me such good balance in I act and have developed. In reading the book mentioned something about how children who at a young age are beaten, or spanked so to speak have tendencies to grow up to be bullies. I was spanked at a young age and do not think I was a bully at all whatsoever. It also states that children that get spanked are likely to become abusive adults. There is the fact that I am only 21 but I do not think that I am abusive at all.
Dec 31 Parenting Styles
Dec 31 Sociocultural Theory of Gender Development
The sociocultural theory had interesting ideas about gender identity formation. I think it is true that young children are encouraged to adopt culturally-accepted gender roles. For example, starting even before children are born, parents often buy blue-themed clothes and room decorations if they are expecting boys and pink ones for girls. This continues into early and middle childhood with the types of clothing children wear, toys they play with, and accepted behavior. For example, people tolerate more active personalities in boys and write it off with the saying “boys will be boys.” However, I don't think the cultural influence of assigning gender roles is as clear-cut as it appears. For example, my nana tried her hardest to get me to enjoy playing with dolls. She bought me everything from collector's dolls to Barbies to American Girl dolls, and I didn't like playing with any of them. I preferred playing with plastic dinosaurs and my brother's Legos. The toys I liked playing with would probably be classified as androgynous. Even so, the way I played with them was more feminine than the way my brother played with them. When we played with Legos together, he would build tanks, guns and spaceships, and I would build houses and “lands” for Lego people to live in. Then he would use his tanks, etc to blow up my Lego land. At the time it was upsetting, but looking back at it makes me laugh. Even when I was playing with androgynous toys, I played with them in a more feminine way (nurturing the Lego people and making sure they had good houses, food, and pets). This makes me wonder if a truly androgynous balance can be achieved when other genetic, behavioral, and cognitive gender development also play a part. And if it could be achieved, would it be a good thing? Or would that person feel like an outcast in a society that embraces gender-roles?
Thursday, December 30, 2010
Overregularization and Vygotsky
There were a few things I found fascinating in Chapter nine. I found the concept of overregularization very interesting, more or less that this tendency in children had been labeled. I can remember doing this myself trying to say or pronounce the correct term for the experiences I’ve had. Overregularization is “the application of rules of grammar even when exceptions occur so that the language is made to seem more regular than it actually is.” (Berger, 2008, pg. 243) It is almost as if children guess what to say if they are not sure.
Another thing I found to be interesting was Vygotsky’s approach to the way children learn. He stated that cognitive development in children was based solely on social context. (Berger, 2008, pg. 234) His approach was very different than Piaget’s but together both theories and approaches mesh well together. Vygotsky called children an “apprentice in thinking” which meant a person who learns from older siblings and people in the environment. (Berger, 2008, pg. 234) To me, Vygotsky’s makes a lot of sense when I think about how I have learned things growing up and who I learned them from. Although children learn on their own, the people around them will always be able to teach them without even trying.
Berger, K. S. (2008). The Developing Person Through the Lifespan. New York: Worth Publishers.Wednesday, December 29, 2010
Egocentrism
Berger, S. K. (2008). The Developing Person: Through the Life Span. New York, NY: Worth Publisher.
Dec 29 Theory of Mind
Reading chapter 9 reminded me of my younger sister, particularly the section on theory of mind and the “sudden leap in understanding” happening around age 4 (Berger, 2008, 238). My sister is 15 now, and it is a running joke in my family that everything important in her life happened when she was 4. There were some big life experiences that happened when she was 4, like getting her first, and most-loved pet, a cat named Nippy, but there were also funny things that we joke about, like her getting married to the same preschool classmate twice. She remembers her first dreams, her first birthday party, and how one of her friends threw scissors at her head. When I read the section about the leap of understanding at age 4, it immediately reminded me of her memories. It made me realize that there is probably a reason it seems like so much happened at that stage of her life. For example, she was developing a theory of mind. She was able to recognize how her new kitten might feel, enough so that she cuddled with her instead of pulling her tail. Although the cat is not human, this still shows that my sister could see others' points of view. Despite developing a theory of mind, my sister's memories still show a definite egocentric point of view. All her memories are things focused on her experiences. Her memories of when she was 4 give proof to Piaget's preoperational theory as well as demonstrating other developmental milestones.
Berger, K. S. (2008). The Developing Person Through the Lifespan. New York: Worth Publishers.
Dec 29 Egocentrism
Dec 29 Classic Mirror Experiment
Tuesday, December 28, 2010
Friday, December 24, 2010
Dec 24 Language Development Via Dr. Suess
Reading the second half of chapter six about language development made me think about Dr. Seuss. Dr. Seuss books were some of the books I loved most as a child because they were about funny people and animals doing funny things like eating green eggs and ham (weird!) or trying to steal Christmas. But learning how infants develop language made me realize how smart Dr. Seuss was in writing his books. Infants first learn simple, one-constant words with similar sounds and their first grammar is in very simple sentences with two to three words (Berger, 169-171, 2008). Dr. Seuss books make use of these kinds of words and sentences on every page. They are words small children can try to pronounce and remember, and they are often repeated, such as in Green Eggs and Ham. The books also use rhyming words, which are easy to learn and remember, helping to increase children's vocabulary. Additionally, Dr. Seuss made use of bright colors, exotic places and characters, and funny sounding words. All of these would be new affordances for children learning how to read. Because they were new and interesting, the kids would want to read or be read to, and their language skills would develop further. I always knew I liked Dr. Seuss (and still do), but I never realized how brilliant he was in helping to teach children to read. :)
Piaget's research
After reading chapter six I learned a lot about Piaget’s research with more in depth detail. The six stages of sensorimotor intelligence to me as well as object permanence really made me think and I feel the need to share it with all of you. The six stages of sensorimotor intelligence to me is fascinating. The fact that just by observation and experiment we can get inside the minds of babies and see how far along they are different ages that match the stages. I also found the three circular reactions to be interesting . The primary circular reactions involve the baby and its own body. The secondary circular reactions involve the baby and an object or another person. The third deals with a child’s first independent action on their way to discovery. The concept of object permanence intrigued me. Object permanence is knowing an object still exists even when you cannot see, touch or hear it. (Berger, 2008 pg. 158) I did not know that to babies younger than about two years could easily forget about something just because it is completely out of site. Although Piaget was a little off in his finding according to the book I still believe without him the field of developmental psychology would not be where it is today.
Dec 24 Language Development
December 24 Case Study Findings
December 24 Habituation
Berger, S. K. (2008). The Developing Person: Through the Life Span. New York, NY: Worth Publisher.
Thursday, December 23, 2010
Dec 23 Cognitive Theory
Chapter 1&2 Blog
My favorite portion of the readings so far was the short story about the nephew David. An embryo and it's mother had reached both of them in rural Kentucky. Once David was born, he was in need of immediate medical treatment for cataracts, a heart ailment, and multiple malformations. David would not grow through childhood like most healthy children. His progression and development was slow. David slowly overcame these obstacles and eventually learned a second language and went to college. After student teaching and having four life skills students, it made me reflect on the challenges these students are faced with daily and the struggle they endure. I am very fortunate to have my health.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Dec 22 Identity vs Role Confusion
It seems that I was stuck in Erikson’s identity vs role confusion stage for a long time past adolescence. Looking back, it’s easy to see the cultural influences and expectations that helped keep me at that stage, but at the time it was difficult to understand. The most interesting part is that I don’t feel like I waited until I had figured out “who I am” and passed the identity vs role confusion stage to enter the intimacy vs isolation stage. I made very close friends at college and my boyfriend and I met at Millersville, all before I figured out what I want from life, let alone anything about grad school and OT. The text didn’t make it clear if the theory allows a person to skip a stage and then come back to deal with that crisis later, but I think my experience would argue that you can.
Contact Comfort and The Social Learning theory
After reading chapter 2, I found a few things that were very enlightening as well as interesting. The first being the whole concept of contact comfort and Harlow’s experiment. I assumed and would have guessed that the monkeys in his experiment would have clung to the food source, not something soft and warm. The results of his experiment did not support behaviorism or the psychoanalytic theory. I also found the social learning theory to be interesting. I think everyone can recall a time when they saw a friend or family member get burned, shocked, or show pain from something that had happened to the person and knew that they did not want to experience the same pain. It is basically learning from other people’s mistakes and achievements, without experiencing it for yourself . I have experienced this many times in the past and still do in the present. When I was about 5 years old my sister, (who would have been 8 or 9) out of curiosity reached up on the ironing board and touched the iron and burned herself. The way she screamed and cried, left me without an ounce of curiosity as to what the iron felt like, and I completely left it alone. I believe this is a good example of the social learning theory.